MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C6AF17.35CEED20" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C6AF17.35CEED20 Content-Location: file:///C:/88D9C636/researchcourseproposal2006.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
LIBRARY
PROPOSAL FOR NEW COUR=
SE:
INFORMATION RESEARCH
Tony Doyle
May 2006
1. Hour: 1; credit: 1=
2. Prerequisites: non=
e
3. Course description=
:
A. Catalog descriptio=
n.
Covers the fundamenta=
ls of
research: selecting a viable topic; identifying appropriate sources; databa=
se
searching methods; proper documentation; information ethics; plagiarism.
B. Expanded descripti=
on:
We will cover the fol=
lowing
topics: (1) The many ways in which information gets to users: books, magazi=
nes,
journals, websites, wikis, and blogs, as well as the different degrees of
reliability accruing to each; the role of peer review in scholarly
communication. (2) Electronic research: selecting a manageable topic; choos=
ing
an appropriate database; identifying keywords; combining keywords with the
boolean operators and, or, and not; the different types of databases (full text, abstracts, and
index). (3) Books: How is searching for books by topic in a catalog differe=
nt
from searching for periodical articles by topic in a database? Why do books
remain a valuable source for research? (4) Working with bibliographies. (5)
Print reference sources and indexes. (6) Evaluating sources: print,
organizational and academic websites, blogs, and wikis. (7) Proper
documentation with Endnote. (8) Information ethics: intellectual freedom,
censorship, intellectual property, copyright, and privacy. (9) Plagiarism a=
nd
academic integrity.
C. Writing requiremen=
ts:
pre-test (diagnostic); six at home assignments; an annotated bibliography a=
s a
final project; a midterm and a final; post test.
4. Rationale
A. Purpose. In its 20=
03 Developing Research and Communication
Skills: Guidelines for Information Literacy in the Curriculum the Middle
States Commission on Higher Education has affirmed that information
literacy—i.e. knowing how to find and evaluate relevant
information—is an essential part of a college education. To this end
Baruch, LaGuardia, and
The course would be a=
imed at
students taking classes that require documented papers. The library already
reaches some 6000 undergraduates a year through single research sessions
scheduled by their professors. However, one meeting is not nearly enough to
initiate students with serious projects into the intricacies of research. A=
lso,
single meetings do not permit librarians to track students’ progress =
or
address their ongoing difficulties. The proposed course would attempt to re=
medy
these shortcomings. It would allow students to pursue a topic in detail, an=
d it
would give the librarian the opportunity to monitor their progress.
B. Scheduling. Flexib=
le. The course
could meet once a week for 50 minutes over the semester or be telescoped in=
to 8
weeks. The course could also be offered as a hybrid, with fewer meetings an=
d a
strong online component, or totally online.
5. Projected enrollme=
nt:
maximum 25 students/section
6. Supporting materia=
ls
Please find sample sy=
llabus
below.
_____________________=
___________________________________________________________________________=
_________________________
Syllabus
Information Research
Course Description
Since the arrival of =
the
internet the problem for students and researchers alike has become not too
little information but too much. This embarrassment of riches means that it=
is
more important now than ever to have the skills for homing in on the
information that you need. The present course strives to meet this need.
We will cover the fol=
lowing
topics: (1) The many ways in which information gets to users: books, magazi=
nes,
journals, websites, wikis, and blogs, as well as the different degrees of
reliability accruing to each; the role of peer review in scholarly journals.
(2) Electronic research: selecting a manageable topic; choosing an appropri=
ate
database; identifying keywords; combining keywords with the boolean operato=
rs and, or,
and not; the different types of
databases (full text, index and abstract, and index). (3) Books: How is
searching for books by subject in a catalog different from searching for
magazine or journal articles by subject in a database? Why do books remain a
valuable source for research? (4) Working with bibliographies; (5) Evaluati=
ng
sources: print, organizational websites, blogs, and wikis. (6) Print indexe=
s. (7)
Proper documentation with Endnote. (8) Information ethics: intellectual
freedom, censorship, intellectual property, copyright, and privacy. (9)
Plagiarism and academic integrity.
Course Goals.
At the end of the cou=
rse you
should be able to:
1. Identify an approp=
riate
topic.
2. Find relevant prin=
t and
electronic sources on your topic.
3. Use the free web
effectively.
4. Evaluate sources, =
both
print and electronic, as to authority, reliability, and bias.
5. Cite your sources
correctly
6. Know what constitu=
tes
plagiarism
Text: Arlene Rodda
Quaratiello, The College Student=
217;s
Research Companion, Third Edition.
Assignments:
Quizzes and participa=
tion:
15%
Homework: 25%
Midterm: 25%
Final project: 35%
Quizzes. Some classes=
will
begin with brief quizzes. These will be on the reading due for that day. Th=
ere
will be no make-ups for those who miss class.
Homework. There will =
six
short homeworks, three of which will relate to the final project (see below=
).
Final project: A ten
component annotated bibliography consisting of two books, four peer-reviewed
articles, two magazine articles, and two internet sources.
Please note: There wi=
ll be no
incompletes.
Schedule
Week 1
Introduction
1. Pre-test (diagnost=
ic)
2. Information
a.
How is information produced?
b.
How does it find its way to you?
c.
How do we assess its credibility?
d.
Peer review
Rationale: Texts don’t fall from the sky. =
Traditionally,
published texts had to meet with the approval of an editor. Students need to
appreciate that the credibility of a text is earned.
Assignment: Select a =
three
possible topics for you final project; due week two
Week 2
Research topic
1. Choosing a viable =
research
topic
2. Topic vs thesis
3. What is a database=
?
a.
Indexes
b.
Indexes with abstracts
c.
Full text databases
4. Choosing the right
databases:
Rationale: Inexperienced researchers tend to cho=
ose
topics that are either too broad or two narrow. Students nearly always need
informed advice about choosing a topic appropriate to the assignment and to=
the
available literature.
Week 3
Searching
1. Boolean methods
2. Subject indexing/h=
eadings;
thesauruses
3. Searching with con=
trolled
vocabulary vs. free test searching
4. Work with specific
databases
Rationale: Boolean methods are fundamental to da=
tabase
searching, and successful boolean searching requires familiarity with subje=
ct
indexing.
Assignment, Boolean
exercises; due week 4.
Week 4
Evaluating results
1. Scholarly, trade, =
and
popular sources
2. Scholarly communic=
ation
3. Determining whethe=
r the
article has a bias—for instance, political or religious—or
orientation
4. Plausibility of
information
5. Older vs. newer ar=
ticles
Rationale: Students need to be able to distingui=
sh
among different kinds of sources—popular, peer-reviewed, and trade. T=
hey
also need to know that many magazines have a religious or political orienta=
tion
or bias.
Week 5
Books
1. Finding them with =
key
words
2. Using subject head=
ings
3. Books as sources of
bibliographies
Rationale: Books are still very much with us a s=
ource for
research. However, the strategy for finding books in a catalog differs from
that of finding articles in a database.
Assignment: Five item
bibliography on your topic, consisting of two books and three articles.
Due week 6.
Week 6
Working with bibliogr=
aphies
Rationale: To the neophyte bibliographies seem t=
o be
written in code. Students need help in cracking the code. They also need to
know how to track down relevant sources in a bibliography.
Week 7
Bibliographies again<= o:p>
1. Putting together a=
bibliography:
Citations with Endnote.
2. Annotated bibliogr=
aphies
3. Writing annotation=
s
Rationale: Endnote has vastly simplified the cre=
ation
of bibliographies. Students will also benefit from looking at sample
annotations.
Week 8
Midterm covering week=
s 1-7.
Week 9
Conventional reference
sources
1. Types of reference
sources: bibliographies, biographical sources, statistical sources, subject
encyclopedias, dictionaries, and handbooks
2. Print indexes and =
print
reference sources
Rationale: With the internet students might be
inclined to overlook print reference sources. They shouldn’t. Publish=
ers
continue to produce a myriad of useful special encyclopedias, statistical
manuals, and so forth.
Assignment: Write ann=
otations
for two articles; due week 10.
Week 10
Research on the web I=
1. The internet vs. p=
rint
2. Authorship and aut=
hority
of websites
3. Evidence of bias of
websites
Rationale. As the cliché has it, the good=
and
bad news is that everything is on the internet. The free web offers much th=
at
is useful to the savvy researcher. Students need a set of easy-to-apply
criteria for evaluating the credibility of websites.
Week 11
Research on the Web: =
II
1. Blogs
2. Wikis
3. Search engines and=
search
directories
Rationale: a continuation of week 10, with atten=
tion
to newer web formats; also a look at some search engines/directories besides
Google.
Assignment: Evaluatio=
n of
sample web sources; due week 13.
Week 12
Field trip to a resea=
rch
library, e.g.,
Rationale: Students d=
oing
serious research will likely have to go beyond Hunter, and the City has some
world class research libraries.
Week 13
Information and argum=
ent.
1. What is an argumen=
t?
2. How does one evalu=
ate
arguments?
Rationale: An important aspect of evaluating
information is being able to distinguish information pieces from argumentat=
ive
ones. How does one identify the conclusion in an argumentative piece? How d=
oes
one identify the premises? Do the premises support the conclusion?
Assignment: Identifyi= ng and evaluating arguments; due week 14.<= o:p>
Week 14
Information ethics
1. Copyright, intelle=
ctual
property, and fair use
2. Censorship and
intellectual freedom
3. Privacy
Rationale: Students should appreciate some of the
moral issues that information raises. For instance, what are the moral
justifications of copyright? How can copyright promote, rather than hinder,
intellectual freedom? How are censorship, intellectual freedom, and privacy
related?
Week 15
Academic integrity and
plagiarism
Rationale: Students are too often unclear about =
what
constitutes plagiarism.
Assignment: Final
project—ten item bibliography—due.
Week 16
Final exam and post-t=
est
|
PAGE=
|